| This document
deals with treatment of historic, not prehistoric, resources and provides
standards for historic resources eligible for inclusion in the National
Register at a state or local level of significance, not at a national level of
significance. The National Park Service (NPS) no longer requires HABS/HAER
documentation on properties of local or state significance, instead,
requesting that SHPOs create their own state standards. Seeking advice from
NPS will be unnecessary in the future unless the resource is of national
significance.
To assist in preparing a treatment plan and in
estimating costs, this document provides standards for treatment of historic
resources eligible for inclusion in the National Register at a state or local
level of significance.
Levels of Significance
Within the framework of the National Register,
the level of significance is defined as the geographic magnitude or scope of a
property's historical significance and can be national, state, or local. Local
significance is defined as the importance of a property to the history of its
community, such as a town, city, or county. Likewise, state significance
refers to the importance of a resource to the history of the state in which it
is located. The following documentation standards are specific to historic
resources eligible to the National Register at the local or state level of
significance.
Resource Categories
For the purposes of this document, a historic
resource is defined as a historic district, building, site, structure, or
object; specifically, any such resource that is listed or eligible for listing
in the National or State Register of Historic Places (See
National Register Bulletin 15, How to Apply the National Register Criteria
for Evaluation, for National Register eligibility criteria).
The following is a partial listing of
historic resource types that might be subjected to the level of documentation
described herein:
District—a geographically definable
area, urban or rural, possessing a significant concentration, linkage, or
continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or
aesthetically by plan or physical development; may also comprise individual
elements separated geographically but linked by association or history.
Examples of historic districts are mining sites with multiple resources,
including buildings and equipment; farms and ranches; and various linear
resources, such as water systems and railroads.
Building—a structure enclosing a space
and providing protection from the elements and that shelters some form of
human activity; typically includes walls, a roof, and other components.
Commercial buildings may include banks, breweries, casinos, factories,
foundries, garages, hangars, laundries, mortuaries, office buildings, railroad
stations, blacksmith's shops, stores, theaters, and warehouses; residential
types may be single family dwellings, duplexes, apartment buildings, barracks,
dormitories, hotels, bunkhouses, quarters, shacks, and shanties; institutional
buildings may be academies, amphitheaters, armories, arsenals, asylums,
aviaries, Capitols and other governmental buildings, churches, courthouses,
fortifications, hospitals, jails, libraries, museums, post offices, and
schools; agricultural and rural buildings may be barns, blinds, cellars,
kennels, pole structures, Quonset huts, sheds, stables, smokehouses, and
storehouses.
Site—location of a significant event, a
historic occupation or activity, or building or structure, whether standing,
ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses significance
independent of the value of any existing structure at the location. Examples
of such a resource include a battlefield, a farm, or a ranch.
Structure—any kind of human
construction; often used to refer to an engineering work, as opposed to a
building, constructed for purposes other than to provide shelter. Examples of
structures include aqueducts, blast furnaces, bridges, cisterns, canals, dams,
fences, fortifications, flumes, railroad turntables, reservoirs, root cellars,
silos, snow sheds, spring houses, stamp mills and other mining equipment,
water tanks, viaducts, wellheads, and windmills.
Object—a material thing of functional,
aesthetic, cultural, historical, or scientific value; typically primarily
artistic in nature or relatively small in scale and simply constructed; may
be, by nature or design, movable yet related to a specific setting or
environment. Examples include airplanes, boats, boundary markers, head stones,
mile posts, monuments, railroad engines, sculptures, statuary, or steam
engines.
Linear Features—are long, narrow works
of human construction, which may be classified by the National Register as
structures, districts, or sites. Examples of linear features include canals,
ditches, fences, flumes, roads and trails, railroad tracks or roadbeds, walls,
or water systems.
Properties Suffering Loss of Integrity—where
there is an impaired authenticity of a property's historic identity. Examples
of properties that have lost integrity, but nevertheless warrant documentation
include structures moved, reconstructed, or altered; portions of linear
features of which other portions remain intact; minor elements of a complex,
unless architecturally distinctive; ruins, collapsed structures, or shells of
structures, which may be eligible for the National Register because of their
historical importance or associations, but that have little
structural/architectural interest and/or integrity.
Documentation Standards
The following documentation standards apply to
the classes of historical properties defined above. In order to satisfy the
documentation requirements for historic properties eligible for the National
Register at the local or state level of significance, a report detailing the
historical context and significance of the property, and architectural and
engineering documentation, including description, plans and photographs of the
property, must be submitted. The requirements for these elements are as
follows:
Historical Documentation—is a detailed
record of the historical context and significance of a property presented in a
report format. Historical documentation will employ appropriate methodology to
obtain the desired information. Methods and techniques of historical research
should be chosen to obtain needed information in the most efficient manner.
Sources will be recorded so that other researchers can verify or locate
information discovered during research. Historical research to create
documentation uses secondary source materials, archival materials, and primary
sources, such as personal records, deed and title books, newspapers, plats,
maps, atlases, photographs, vital records, censuses, historical narratives,
and interviews with individuals. The historical documentation section should
include the following elements:
1) Title Page—should include the title of the
report, including the nature and location of the project, the author of the
report, the sponsoring institution, association or agency, and the date the
report was prepared.
2) Table of Contents—should list report
chapters and all subdivisions, including study unit sections. Pagination
must be shown in the table of contents.
3) Introduction—should summarize the purpose
of the documentation, the eligibility criteria used to evaluate the
resource, the level of significance the resource possesses, the reason for
the mitigation (i.e., impending threat to the resource), objectives for
conducting the historical documentation, the scope of the project, and the
agencies involved. A map showing the location of the project must be
included.
4) Documentation Methodology—should include
an explanation of the procedures used to execute the documentation,
including the name of the researcher, date of the research, sources
searched, and limitations of the project.
5) Historical Narrative—should provide a full
description of the resource(s), a historical context against which
significance is assessed, and a comprehensive history of the resource. The
following elements should be included in this section:
a) Historical Context—including early
settlement, historical overview, and physical development of the project
area. The historical context should be guided by the thematic study units
identified in the Nevada Comprehensive Preservation Plan (1991).
b) Designers, Engineers, and
Builders—including biographical information on architects, landscape
architects, engineers, builders and contractors, and other designers who
practiced in the project area.
c) Notable People—including biographical
information on major figures in the community's history and in the history
of the resource being documented.
6. Bibliography—references to secondary
sources should indicate author, title, and date of publication. Primary
sources should be identified by name, collection identifier, and location.
Interviews should be noted including the date and location of the interview,
names of both parties.
Architectural and Engineering Documentation—the
historic significance of the building, site, structure, or object will be
conveyed through description, drawings, photographs, and other materials that
comprise documentation. The appropriate level of documentation for properties
eligible for the National Register at a local, regional, or state level of
significance must include:
1) Narrative description that creates a rough
sketch of the building and its site. Describe the building in a logical
sequence: from the ground up, facade by facade, from the exterior to
the interior. Include the architectural style, if applicable, exterior and
interior features, materials and systems.
2) Photographs with 35mm black-and-white
negatives of exterior and interior views of the resource. The exterior
should be documented by at least six views including a) the
front and one side; b) the rear and one side; c) the front elevation; d)
environmental view showing the building as part of its larger landscape; e)
major elements of the building, including doors, windows, additions, etc.;
and f) details, such as materials and hardware. Interior photographs should
yield information about the floor plan. Three or four views should be
sufficient to document the significant elements of the interior, unless the
resource is large or complex;
3) Reproductions of historic photographs, if
available. Provide negatives and 4-x-6" black-and-white photographs with
submission;
4) Photocopies of existing drawings or plans
(including scale), if available. If permission is required to reproduce
historic photographs, plans, maps, or other materials, it is the
responsibility of the researcher to obtain proper authorizations.
5) Drawings, site plan, and sketch plan. The
site plan must include the resource's orientation in its natural landscape
and include the scale and a north arrow. The sketch plan will show the
layout and floor plan of the resource, including all associated features.
The sketch plan need not be a "measured drawing," but an approximate scale
should be included.
6) Location mapsa site location map, on a
separate 8.5-x-11-inch sheet, showing the location of the resource and
associated properties must be provided. For rural properties, the preferred
base map is a 7.5-minute USGS quadrangle. For urban properties, a city
street map may be more appropriate. Choose a map scale that will include
sufficient area surrounding the resource to show the property in reference
to cross streets and/or other local landmarks. All maps must have the
resource clearly marked and identified, a north arrow, and the name and date
of the map. An Assessor's Parcel Map with the subject property indicated on
it may be submitted in addition to the site location map.
7) All photographs, photocopies, and drawings
will be labeled on the back in pencil identifying the name of the property,
the date rendered, the name of the photographer or renderer, orientation of
the photograph or drawing. Photographs should not be pasted, glued, or
otherwise adhered to the pages of the report. Please place them in
properly-labeled archival jackets.
Submission Requirements
The documentation submission must include two
copies sent to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Three copies
will be required if the resource is located within the boundaries of a
Certified Local Government (CLG), i.e., City of Reno, Carson City Historic
District, City of Las Vegas, or the Comstock Historic District. The SHPO will
distribute the copies to the appropriate repository (see below) and CLG. The
repository's copy must include:
- The narrative report of the resource's
description, historical context, and significance
- one full set of negatives
- one full set of black-and-white, 4-x-6
photographs in archival jackets
- one copy each of drawings, plans, site
plans, sketch plans, etc.
The SHPO's and CLG's copies must include all of
the above except the negatives, which will be retained by the
repository.
Upon receipt, the SHPO will review the
documentation for completeness within 30 days. The SHPO will send its comments
to the preparer for action, if needed. Any required changes should be
submitted to the SHPO in duplicate (or triplicate, in the case of a CLG). The
SHPO will insert the changed sections and forward the final documents to the
appropriate repository.
Records Storage—Repositories
One copy of each mitigative documentation
report will be added to the State's architectural resources inventory and will
be available for public inspection at the SHPO, 100 N. Stewart Street, Carson
City, NV 89701.
One copy, which will include the original
negatives, will be sent to one of the following repositories, depending on the
location of the resource being documented. The following five repositories
will receive mitigative documentation:
Nevada Historical Society, Reno
Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, Las Vegas
Northeastern Nevada Historical Society, Elko
North Central Nevada Historical Society, Winnemucca
Central Nevada Historical Society, Tonopah
There are four Certified Local Governments (CLGs)
in the State of Nevada, which will receive one copy of the mitigative
documentation for any resources within their boundaries. The four CLGs are
represented by the following organizations:
Historical Resources Commission, City of
Reno
Historical Architecture Review Commission, Carson City Historic District
Las Vegas Historical Commission, City of Las Vegas
Comstock Historic District Commission, Virginia City
Bibliography
Ames, David
1997 A Primer on Architectural Photography and the Photo Documentation of
Historic Structures. Vernacular Architecture Forum 73 (Fall
1997):17-24.
Bucher, Ward, editor
1996 Dictionary of Building Preservation. John Wiley and Sons, New
York.
California Office of Historic Preservation
1995 Linear Feature Record. In Instructions for Recording Historical
Resources. California Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento.
Myhrer, Keith
1993 Viewing Transportation Features in Time and Space: A Regional Historic
Transportation Systems Model. Nevada Archaeologist. Volume 11.
National Park Service
1983 Secretary of Interior's Standards for and Guidelines for Archaeology
and Historic Preservation. F8 Federal Register 44716-68.
1991 How to Apply National Register Criteria
for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin 15. National Park Service,
Washington, D.C.
Nevada State Historic Preservation Office
1994 Guidelines Pertinent to the Conduct of Historical Archaeology in
the State of Nevada (Draft). State Historic Preservation Office, Carson
City.
1998 How to Prepare Nominations to the
National Register of Historic Places: A Guide for Nevada Property Owners.
State Historic Preservation Office, Carson City.
White, William, Ronald M. James, and Richard
Bernstein
1991 Nevada Comprehensive Preservation Plan, second edition. Division
of Historic Preservation and Archaeology, Carson City.
(Updated 1999)
|